|
|
|
After Bhutto, the deluge
Mahmud Sipra
Those that planned and finally took her life may have succeeded in
depriving her supporters and her young family of her physical
presence but in doing so they have unwittingly unleashed a deluge
that their misguided agenda will now find impossible to withstand.
To take Benazir Bhutto’s name in the past tense is hard. It is going
to be even harder to visualise Pakistan’s politics without her
towering presence. Like her father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto before her,
she strode like a colossus over Pakistan’s political landscape
during her short political life leaving an indelible imprint stamped
on the psyche of a people. To Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, they came to
listen to. To Benazir, they came not so much to listen to but to
feel her reassuring presence. If ZAB was the stuff of legerdemain,
his daughter Benazir will now be Joan of Arc.
No obituary, no eulogy, no amount of outpouring of grief at her
tragic death will adequately explain the chemistry she enjoyed with
the people. Her ability to photosynthesize with the people — that
great reservoir of raw power from where she derived her own immense
energy and political strength — was matched by only one other person
before her — her father.
In politics, you were either for her or against her. In death, one
can only be for her. She is now the daughter, the sister and the
mother of every Pakistani man, woman and child. She recently
returned after an eight-year hiatus under the aegis of a
controversial arrangement offered to her by President Musharraf. An
arrangement, in no less measure, encouraged and structured by
Washington. That her return, triumphant as it might have been,
suffered from a fundamental weakness — rightly or wrongly — of
carrying the “Made in Washington” label. A label that exposed her
immediately to the ever watchful and furtive eye of religious
extremists, purists and her political detractors who now saw the
Daughter of the East as not one of us but as one of them.
Her high profile return to a tumultuous welcome, marred within hours
of her arrival by a suicide bomber, left over 130 dead. An attack
she narrowly survived herself. The agonised cry of the injured and
the maimed that rent the air that night was only to be the
forerunner of a much darker day and nights ahead. But the night
passed.
To exacerbate matters, Washington’s blatant attempt at nation
building with the noble intent of putting Pakistan on the fast track
to democracy coincided with President Musharraf’s own domestic
problems.
Not the least of which was his imposition of an “Emergency” in the
country. It backfired with dramatic repercussions. Forced on to the
back foot by a plethora of internal and external pressures —
President Musharraf (then General) shed his uniform- and announced
January 8, 2008 as the date for general elections.
In a just world it would have to be accepted that President
Musharraf kept his word and Benazir kept hers — by going on the
campaign trail with vigour. Somewhere between her brave journey into
Balochistan and the North Western Frontier in rallies and speeches
she said something that must have convinced those that straddle the
borders with Afghanistan that this was no status quo lady — she
meant business.
And the game got bigger and deadlier. With less then 12 days to go
for elections, her election juggernaut made a scheduled stop in
Rawalpindi for her speech at a venue where the country’s first prime
minister had fallen to an assassin’s bullet. Not too far from where
her late father had been executed.
Speaking extemporaneously with a voice gone hoarse from a gruelling
campaign, she chided, she mocked and she challenged. “This is my
country and I will rid it of all those who threaten it and its
people...we will do it together, you and I.” This is what the crowds
had come to hear. This was vintage Benazir. The address over without
incident, she left the stage among a sea of her supporters and
security men.
Safe inside her bulletproof vehicle — her cavalcade sluggishly made
for the exit gate breaching one of the basic rules of security: A
fast exit is the safest exit. Her supporters gathered around the
vehicle — forcing it to a crawl and to a stall. Then for some
inexplicable reason — throwing caution to the winds — she emerged
from the safety of her armoured vehicle through the sunroof. She
didn’t see it coming and it seems neither did her security detail.
The staccato sound of gunfire and, a split-second later, a blast.
Then mayhem. A limb here, a hand there and blood everywhere. The
nightmare scenario of October 18 was being replayed all over again —
only this time they succeeded. Overnight the dynamics changed.
The country went into a violent tailspin. While the world watched in
horror and disbelief, President Musharraf quickly moved to calm an
explosive situation by immediately declaring a 3-day mourning
period. Washington uncharacteristically went silent leaving
President Musharraf even more isolated then he already is. Giving
quick currency to the thinking: it’s his mess, let him sort it out.
Far away in chilly Iowa — Benazir’s assassination and Pakistan
became a campaign issue with both party candidates weighing in with
their views. Significant among the comments, this nugget from
Hillary Clinton, evidencing her foreign policy prowess: “What do you
expect — it is a garrison town!” Really? The Republicans were
somewhat more circumspect. The received wisdom from Senator McCain’s
stance could be interpreted as: losing one potential ally is bad
enough; but to now undermine an existing one could not possibly be
good policy or good politics. If he didn’t say it maybe he should
have.
Those that planned and finally took her life may have succeeded in
depriving her supporters and her young family of her physical
presence but in doing so they have unwittingly unleashed a deluge
that their misguided agenda will now find impossible to withstand.
There being nothing more forceful or fearsome then the wrath of a
wounded nation.
There is no dearth of forces political or religious, or the myriad
other movements that seem set to destabilize Pakistan today. Any one
who believes that Pakistan’s problems are restricted to the troubled
areas contiguous to Afghanistan is clinging to dangerous fiction.
That wolf is not just at the door — he is amongst us!
Like all such tragedies, the assassination of Benazir will be open
to questions conjecture and rumour. More then forty years and eight
presidents later, the death of JFK remains shrouded in mystery. More
recently the death of Princess Diana is still the subject of
conjecture and conflicting “eye witness” accounts. Benazir’s death —
despite the presence of the world’s press, news cameras, thousands
of her supporters, her janesars and a security force provided by the
government — is now becoming a circus of smoke and mirrors.
In life Benazir held out the promise of a moderate democracy — sadly
a promise she was unable to keep. The void left by her untimely
death in her party’s hierarchy is now overseen by a triad: her young
son, Bilawal; his father Asif Ali Zardari; and the avuncular Amin
Fahim. But it was Mr. Zardari who struck a welcome new note by
speaking of the “Federation” from Naudero the other day thereby
immediately setting the pace towards bringing together a fragmented
society, a fractious electorate and a people who till yesterday were
suffering from apathy and political fatigue. All that may now
change.
It is wisely said that when a group of people ask questions of
others it is called an investigation but when the people start
asking questions of themselves it is called self-examination. The
time for that may have arrived.
If this comes about then it shall be the enduring legacy that
Benazir Bhutto would have left behind. 
|
|